Pages

Thursday, April 26, 2007

FUCK!! I WROTE A LONG APOLOGY LETTER AND NOW ITS FUCKING GONE.. STUPID BLOGGER.COM.... FUCK MY INTERNET BROWSER! WASTED 40MINS TRYING TO THINK OF SOMETHING GOOD TO SAY. WHAT THE FUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


MAIN THING I WANTED TO SAY WAS IM FRIGGIN GOD DAMN SORRY! .. FUCK BLOGGER.. I HATE U SHIT FUCK !!! WASTED MY TIME FOR TAT GAY APOLOGY LETTER.. KK NOT GAY., BUT WATF!!

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Here's the Funny Video clip for this week
David Blaine Street Magic U TUBE EDITION
loads of the videos are circling youtube. go check it out
heres one

YVONNW

Ho Ho...
Yvonne strikes again. EXTRA.. EXTRA!! Read all about IT
Yet again she hasn't failed to ruin my life.. The whore, actually read ma blog? and i thought she had forgotten all about it..Yeah..She called my dad, told my dad, about my blog and everything tat was inside. forcing me to, change the url which is currently diquehead.blogspot.com. Well this is temporary, i'll revert it back to complacentkid after the Jun holidays. Yvonne dearest here wanted me to make a public apology to her, which i'd glady have no problem doing, just tat i won't be sinciere and i wont mean it... Muahhaha but she couldn't make me,cos she knows that i wont mean it and it's just fucking pointless. :D good move there bitch!!

Today during, her same, pointless,boring,mediorcre class... haha She brought me to Mr John Lim, Dang! She broke my spree.. I haven't been brought to him since like.. last year? and he's been praising me all this while.. till Yvonne brought me to his attention.. She not only told him about me flaming her online, but she also told him about me scodling the principal and calling her unfit to be the one... WTF? Why can't she just fuckin leave me alone? At least, i only scolded her online and not in school.. I just go to school and carry on with her lessons asuming tat there's no problem whatso ever. but there she goes again, trying to be the fucking extra bitch on the block... WHY CAN'T SHE JUST FUCKING LEAVEEEE ME AND MY BLOG ALONE I prefer to be left alone u whore incase u dont know/didn't notice!!

So now.. i'm probably gonna get caning, she said she'll make SURE of that!! FCK THE WHAT?????? u think i care? woot tats it 1 cane and im off!! :D (You're super pathetic) and she's also gonna sue me for defamation.. yeah suure bitch go ahead. if u really want charity from me fine? go ahead by all means i've got loads of cash to spare u u know.. but why take the trouble to bring it to court.. u can ask me for money anytime.. i ain't poor like u slut! I STILL THINK UR A SLUT. U THINK WAT UR GONNA DO IS GONNA STOP ME? WELL HELL NO! I AIN'T GONNA STOP WAT I wanna do! FUCK U WHORE!!!

In law, defamation is the communication of a statement that makes a false claim, expressly stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an individual, business, product, group, government or nation. Most jurisdictions allow legal actions, civil and/or criminal, to deter various kinds of defamation and retaliate against criticism.

The common law origins of defamation lie in the torts of slander (harmful statement in a transitory form, especially speech) and libel (harmful statement in a fixed medium, especially writing but also a picture, sign, or electronic broadcast), each of which gives a common law right of action.

"Defamation" is the general term used internationally, and is used in this article where it is not necessary to distinguish between "slander" and "libel". Libel and slander both require publication. The fundamental distinction between libel and slander lies solely in the form in which the defamatory matter is published. If the offending material is published in some fleeting form, as by spoken words or sounds, sign language, gestures and the like, then this is slander. If it is published in more durable form, for example in written words, film, compact disc and the like, then it is considered libel.


Singapore law
Singapore has perhaps the world's strongest libel laws. The country's leaders have clearly indicated to the public that libel on the Internet will not be tolerated and abusers will be severely punished. On March 6, 1996, the government made providers and publishers liable for the content placed on the Internet. Even the owners of cybercafes may be held liable for libelous statements posted or possibly viewed in their establishments.[11]

In 2001, a Singapore bank was fined $2 million for accidentally publishing a mildly libelous statement during the heated discussion of a takeover bid. The mistake was corrected very quickly, and there was no intent to do harm. In fact, it was reported that no harm seems to have been done. Nevertheless, the offended parties were awarded $1 million each. Apparently confirming the stringency of Singapore’s defamation law, Business Times declined to report on the matter because one of the libeled parties objected