Abstinance Only education isn't a women's rights problem, that's a "People are fucking retarded" problem.
I don't see how charging women more for healthcare based on the fact that child birth is expensive is sexist. It's reality. That's a different topic altogether though.
Friday, August 6, 2010
women please..
radical feminist'
to quote Inigo Montoya "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
You might also want to read something called "Politics and the English Language" by George Orwell. It's kind of important and think you could glean some interesting things from it. personally I think Turbo Feminists is probably a good term for them because they saw the edge of the idea, floored it to get there and never stopped to look where they are, where they were going and where reality is. Eventually they end up at this strange, skewed idea of the original thought Works for anything and without mucking up something that's pretty clear in definition unlike fundamental or extremist. Of course, if you consider what hyper means and where it's -rooted-, you'd find it probably works just as good as Turbo, if not better.
Besides that I wouldn't say you're wrong. :) While there are crazies out there, letting them colour your perceptions of an entire group or idea essentially sets you on the same dumbass road they went down, but in a whole new direction.
to quote Inigo Montoya "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."
You might also want to read something called "Politics and the English Language" by George Orwell. It's kind of important and think you could glean some interesting things from it. personally I think Turbo Feminists is probably a good term for them because they saw the edge of the idea, floored it to get there and never stopped to look where they are, where they were going and where reality is. Eventually they end up at this strange, skewed idea of the original thought Works for anything and without mucking up something that's pretty clear in definition unlike fundamental or extremist. Of course, if you consider what hyper means and where it's -rooted-, you'd find it probably works just as good as Turbo, if not better.
Besides that I wouldn't say you're wrong. :) While there are crazies out there, letting them colour your perceptions of an entire group or idea essentially sets you on the same dumbass road they went down, but in a whole new direction.
Seriously, FUCK feminists/"women studies", it's just a gigantic misandry complex
i was listening on the radio to a program on divorce. They're talking about the push for a standard of 50/50 - that is, divorce judges should BEGIN at an evenly split 50/50 joint custody rather than automatically work towards a "Winner Takes All" approach where one parent owns all rights.
This guy professor comes on, explains the concept and why it works, citing studies that statistically prove that it works better because it leads to more joint-custody situations, which in turn has been proven to be better for the child.
Then some feminist law professor comes on and basically says,
1) "Men don't do any parenting work why should they be able to have an even share of custody"
2) "Men abuse their wives, and it's unfair for victims to have to prove in court they shouldn't get 50/50"
3) "Men are bad at parenting, that's just a social reality"
Actually she basically uses "social reality" throughout the entire speech as some justification for her blatant sexism. At the end of it she, word for word, says that men wouldn't be able to provide as well for the children.
FUCK. THAT.
I mean, never mind your subjective BS of who parents more/better, what about the common fact that women make $0.77 for every dollar men make? Doesn't that fucking imply that a man is more likely to be able to provide for his children? My god.
I mean I'm all for equality of the sexes, but it's just so retarded. "Women studies" - that's a godamned joke. You might as well call that class "NO BOYS ALLOWED" because I haven't seen a single one of those classes with anything less than a 95/5 split. I can't take anyone in that field seriously until the majority finally get off their high horse and rename the subject "gender studies" or whatever.
Sorry, I just had to vent.
This guy professor comes on, explains the concept and why it works, citing studies that statistically prove that it works better because it leads to more joint-custody situations, which in turn has been proven to be better for the child.
Then some feminist law professor comes on and basically says,
1) "Men don't do any parenting work why should they be able to have an even share of custody"
2) "Men abuse their wives, and it's unfair for victims to have to prove in court they shouldn't get 50/50"
3) "Men are bad at parenting, that's just a social reality"
Actually she basically uses "social reality" throughout the entire speech as some justification for her blatant sexism. At the end of it she, word for word, says that men wouldn't be able to provide as well for the children.
FUCK. THAT.
I mean, never mind your subjective BS of who parents more/better, what about the common fact that women make $0.77 for every dollar men make? Doesn't that fucking imply that a man is more likely to be able to provide for his children? My god.
I mean I'm all for equality of the sexes, but it's just so retarded. "Women studies" - that's a godamned joke. You might as well call that class "NO BOYS ALLOWED" because I haven't seen a single one of those classes with anything less than a 95/5 split. I can't take anyone in that field seriously until the majority finally get off their high horse and rename the subject "gender studies" or whatever.
Sorry, I just had to vent.
backpackz
dick. (W) says:
*i want a
*nice foreign girl, that's backpacking too
*u know
*meet her
Eternal ruler says:
*go
dick. (W) says:
*and then go on the trip together
Eternal ruler says:
*backpack
*in
*europe
*fag
dick. (W) says:
*then we like live togehter for a while, when we're done
*we say bye to each other
*go back to our country
*write letters to each other
*make phone class. (calls)
*then suddenly decide we really want to see each other
*and one of us will go over for a short visit.
*then while we're there on visit we suddenly realise, hey that's my better half and we decided immediately that this person makes me so happy i want to be with her.
Eternal ruler says:
*ya la
dick. (W) says:
*So you settle down in her/your country and find a decent job and save up and start life afresh.
Eternal ruler says:
*i had the imagination of that before
dick. (W) says:
*we're such dreamers..
*i want a
*nice foreign girl, that's backpacking too
*u know
*meet her
Eternal ruler says:
*go
dick. (W) says:
*and then go on the trip together
Eternal ruler says:
*backpack
*in
*europe
*fag
dick. (W) says:
*then we like live togehter for a while, when we're done
*we say bye to each other
*go back to our country
*write letters to each other
*make phone class. (calls)
*then suddenly decide we really want to see each other
*and one of us will go over for a short visit.
*then while we're there on visit we suddenly realise, hey that's my better half and we decided immediately that this person makes me so happy i want to be with her.
Eternal ruler says:
*ya la
dick. (W) says:
*So you settle down in her/your country and find a decent job and save up and start life afresh.
Eternal ruler says:
*i had the imagination of that before
dick. (W) says:
*we're such dreamers..
greatness
I mean to say, is there on some level which we can understand why that person enjoys some process so much that they shun out all other activities, mingling or otherwise. I mean to say, how does any activity/process become so rewarding that someone would sacrifice all other potential possibilities without hesitation. Whereas the average person, fiddles and runs around rather aimlessly not knowing what to do. The average person doesn't spend all his/her time doing one activity because their brain says, "This is too costly for x reason, I don't like it."
From where does this desire stem. Why do only a very few have it?
Because we are great people. We were chosen. We were destined for it.
Stems from the results.
Best example i con provide is WoW.[worldofwarcraft] In comparison to real life, results and rewards are immediate and happen regularly. It makes you feel as if you're accomplishing something.
Now what those rewards are, that's the real question. Some people get sincere satisfaction out of creation and completing something, even if no one else gives a damn. I think it's normally those people that you see that shut everything else out.
From where does this desire stem. Why do only a very few have it?
Because we are great people. We were chosen. We were destined for it.
Stems from the results.
Best example i con provide is WoW.[worldofwarcraft] In comparison to real life, results and rewards are immediate and happen regularly. It makes you feel as if you're accomplishing something.
Now what those rewards are, that's the real question. Some people get sincere satisfaction out of creation and completing something, even if no one else gives a damn. I think it's normally those people that you see that shut everything else out.
Appreciated
Expectations placed on us to succeed, to make your friends and family proud, and to feel appreciated. We think no one will appreciate us unless we do things deemed to be worthy.
Is doing what you love an impossible achievement, only attained by self-delusion
Is anything besides friends and family really that important, really that great? Is the process of plucking strings and rhythmically moving a brush, or finding patterns and solving equations that incredibly satisfying that you tunnel vision out all other life possibilities? I'm trying to rationalize why the truly great people get so obsessed about their respective fields and forgo all other pleasures... why 99.5% of everyone else doesn't really care that much, yet wishes they had some unyielding passion.
Why is it the happiness criterion for people in third world countries is so much less than ours? They can be happy for some much less than 99.9% of anyone in this country or anyone you know. Do we self-delude (that's a bit harsh) into being happy, into enjoying something?
Why is it the happiness criterion for people in third world countries is so much less than ours? They can be happy for some much less than 99.9% of anyone in this country or anyone you know. Do we self-delude (that's a bit harsh) into being happy, into enjoying something?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)